Which New Leadership Paradigm Do You Mean?

Written by:

Last weekend I drove from Chicago to New York and back to attend the wedding of one of the designers on my team. I didn’t go because I like weddings (I don’t), or because I’m great a socializing (so not), or because I wanted to spend 30 hours in the car in one weekend (does anybody?). I went because I was honored to be invited into the real life of a young woman I work with every day, and I wanted to be sure to accept that invitation. 

Reading the different leadership perspectives felt like watching the changing landscape through the window. In Illinois, the practical Terese Amabile and Mukti Khaire. Through Indiana for Puccio, Mance, and Murdock – there’s something good in there, but it’s hard to see it through the smog. And then into Pennsylvania, deep into the rolling hills of Scharmer, the quiet strength of Ella Baker, and the hospitality of Margaret Wheatley and Debbie Frieze. And then into Jersey for no-nonsense Carol Sanford and onto the banks of long island for morality and aesthetics where frankly, I got lost and had to pull over. 

The visions were similar, but the approaches are like New York and Chicago-style pizza. (Which is to say, all pizza… but also very different). 

But I keep coming back to Jaqueline Novogratz. Everything that resonates with me is interconnected with her definition of Moral Imagination as “the humility to see the world as it is and the audacity to imagine what it could be.”

Humility is acting as a host instead of a hero (Margaret Wheatley). It is being a Fundi like Ella Baker, who “does not seek credit or fame” (Preskill). It is being “more interested in developing leadership in others than in getting recognition for their individual achievements” (Preskill). It requires “listening, affirming, questioning, and only rarely, asserting” (Preskill).

Seeing the world as it is requires listening deeply, and observing. It is being open to thoughts, ideas, and feelings that come from somewhere deep within yourself and the world around you. This is“generative listening” according to Otto Sharmer, “a deep attention and awareness” and opening our will to “connect to the highest future possibility that can emerge.” 

Audacity means getting radical like Ella Baker, by “facing a system that does not lend itself to your needs and devising means by which you change that system.” 

Imagining the world as it could be is visualizing a future that doesn’t exist yet and that doesn’t even have words to describe it.  It means laying the path and walking it, as Iain Kerr and Jason Frasca outline in Innovating Emergent Futures. It requires curiosity, and creativity. This is where we ask questions, have meaningful conversations, immerse ourselves and listen some more. Where is here? What is in the middle?

A leader’s job is to use their humility, listening, audacity, and imagination to create change.  It is also to cultivate humility, observation, audacity, and imagination in others through creating a safe environment for others to have ideas, learn from mistakes and develop as leaders themselves. 

It was a long drive, but it was worth it. After the ceremony and dinner, the music shifted to a low resounding thump, and people started to dance. 

The world needs audacious people with the courage to get out on the dance floor, even when it’s too loud, even when the music sucks, even when they have no idea how to dance and no control over the playlist.

We need curious, deep listeners who connect so profoundly to the beat that they are already dancing to the next song before it starts.

We need imaginative people who will create radical new dance moves on the fly – the kind that inspires others not to copy them but to create their own.  

We need humble, genuine leaders that will get in the middle of it all as they are, hair wild, shoes off, eyeliner smudged, and scream the words together.

Let’s dance.

2 responses to “Which New Leadership Paradigm Do You Mean?”

  1. Mm Avatar
    Mm

    I wrote the first draft of this in the car, tethered to my phone and using my iPad to refer to the readings. I felt like I had the start of something, but I couldn’t quite connect the dots. After revisiting it without trying not to get car sick I think I got much closer. I knew in my gut that there was something in the Moral Imagination that tied things together for me, but it took a few drafts to really link it. In the end, I feel like writing this helped me narrow in on what’s resonating most for me, and the kind of leader that I want to be.

    I found the process of reading all of the different perspectives to be very valuable, and it was easy to tell at the end which of them spoke to me by how much highlighting and underlining was on each one. I’ve revisited the ones that are liberally marked up often and I’m starting to add some of those sections to the ‘notepad’ tab on this site so I can refer to them whenever I need to.

    There was a point in my life when I was very good at more academic style writing. But I am out of practice at citing sources, proper use of quotations, and things like that – and it is really feeling like something I need to work on.

    I will continue to work on this piece, and I think it will eventually become a permanent resident of my future website!

  2. ragsdale8 Avatar
    ragsdale8

    Excellent revision. It’s really finding its shape and you seem to be on your way to eventually writing that manifesto. :)

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Human Soup

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading